|
51%
Kingbell Smart K3
₹3,250
(Discontinued)
|
53%
Lenovo RocStar A319
₹6,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Kingbell Smart K3 vs Lenovo RocStar A319
Comparing the Kingbell Smart K3 vs Lenovo RocStar A319 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lenovo RocStar A319 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Kingbell Smart K3 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Lenovo RocStar A319 the better performer.
Display: Kingbell Smart K3 offers a screen size of 4.3 inches, while Lenovo RocStar A319 offers 4 inches, making Kingbell Smart K3 the larger display of the two. Both Kingbell Smart K3 and Lenovo RocStar A319 feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Lenovo RocStar A319 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Kingbell Smart K3 offers 2 MP, making Lenovo RocStar A319 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Lenovo RocStar A319 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Kingbell Smart K3 offers 0.3 MP, making Lenovo RocStar A319 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Kingbell Smart K3 and Lenovo RocStar A319 offer the same 1500 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Kingbell Smart K3 and Lenovo RocStar A319 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lenovo RocStar A319 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Kingbell Smart K3 has a rating of 1.
|
✕
Kingbell Smart K3
₹3,250
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lenovo RocStar A319
₹6,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
51%
|
53%
|
Release Date
|
13 Oct, 2014
|
21 Oct, 2014
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
1/5
(1 rating)
|
3.5/5
(504 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Oct 21, 2014
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
217 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
58.93 %
|
57.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
131.2 mm
|
123.5 mm
|
Width
|
68 mm
|
63.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.2 mm
|
10.2 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
130 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 3.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Digital Dolby Digital Plus
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|