Kyocera Hydro Vibe
₹10,499
(Discontinued)
|
78%
iQOO Z9x
₹11,039
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Kyocera Hydro Vibe vs iQOO Z9x
Comparing the Kyocera Hydro Vibe vs iQOO Z9x across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Z9x runs at a higher processing speed of 2.2 GHz, while Kyocera Hydro Vibe runs at 1.2 GHz, making iQOO Z9x the better performer.
Display: iQOO Z9x offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while Kyocera Hydro Vibe offers 4.5 inches, making iQOO Z9x the larger display of the two. Kyocera Hydro Vibe features a IPS LCD display compared to iQOO Z9x's LCD, making Kyocera Hydro Vibe the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iQOO Z9x offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Kyocera Hydro Vibe offers 8 MP, making iQOO Z9x better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: iQOO Z9x offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Kyocera Hydro Vibe offers 2 MP, making iQOO Z9x better for front camera photography.
Battery: iQOO Z9x offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Kyocera Hydro Vibe offers 2000 mAh, making iQOO Z9x better for longer battery life.
Storage: Kyocera Hydro Vibe offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while iQOO Z9x offers 128 GB, making Kyocera Hydro Vibe the better option for storage.
|
✕
Kyocera Hydro Vibe
₹10,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
iQOO Z9x
₹11,039
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
18 Aug, 2015
|
21 May, 2024
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 400
|
Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.3/5
(17,215 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
552,168
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
20h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 21, 2024
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v14
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 305
|
Adreno 710
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
552,168
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
43.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
612
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
17.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.96 %
|
86.58 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
127.4 mm
|
165.70 mm
|
Width
|
63.5 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.9 mm
|
7.99 mm
|
Weight
|
139 grams
|
199 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
20h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 0m 52s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|