LG C3380 vs Micromax X600

Comparing the LG C3380 vs Micromax X600 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax X600 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while LG C3380 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax X600 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Micromax X600 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while LG C3380 offers 16 GB, making Micromax X600 the better option for storage.

LG C3380

(Discontinued)

Micromax X600

₹1,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2005

24 Jul, 2010

Display

N/A	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
N/A	LCD
160.00x 160 pixels px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

16 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

N/A	3.7/5 (45 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels px

320x240 px

Pixel Density

N/A

125 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

50.15 %

Design

Height

88.80 mm

113 mm

Width

47.30 mm

56 mm

Thickness

24.00 mm

12.70 mm

Weight

85 grams

110 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Yes

Camera Features

N/A	Digital Zoom Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3.5(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

16 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 player

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

facilities

N/A