LG K92
₹26,790
(Not Released in India)
|
80%
Samsung Galaxy F62
₹29,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
LG K92 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
Comparing the LG K92 vs Samsung Galaxy F62 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F62 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.73 GHz, while LG K92 runs at 2.0 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy F62 the better performer.
Display: Both LG K92 and Samsung Galaxy F62 offer the same screen size of 6.7 inches, but Samsung Galaxy F62 features a Super AMOLED Plus display compared to LG K92's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy F62 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both LG K92 and Samsung Galaxy F62 feature a 64 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy F62 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while LG K92 offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F62 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy F62 offers a higher battery capacity with 7000 mAh, while LG K92 offers 4000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy F62 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both LG K92 and Samsung Galaxy F62 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
|
✕
LG K92
₹26,790
(Not Released in India)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F62
₹29,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
26 Jan, 2022
|
16 Feb, 2021
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 690
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.73 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
12 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
16 MP
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.2/5
(138,727 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
425,285
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
16h 57m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Feb 16, 2021
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 560 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 560 |
Octa core
2.73 GHz, Dual core, Exynos M4 2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.95 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619L
|
Mali-G76 MP12
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
425,285
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
43.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
40.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
420 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
393 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.42 %
|
86.66 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
166.3 mm
|
163.9 mm
|
Width
|
77.2 mm
|
76.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
9.5 mm
|
Weight
|
202.4 grams
|
218 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Front Camera
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 50 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
16h 57m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 40m 22s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N5
TDD N41 / N71 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.74 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|