|
52%
Lava A48
₹2,399
(Discontinued)
|
Spice Xlife 514Q
₹3,659
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava A48 vs Spice Xlife 514Q
Comparing the Lava A48 vs Spice Xlife 514Q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava A48 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Spice Xlife 514Q runs at 1.2 GHz, making Lava A48 the better performer.
Display: Spice Xlife 514Q offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava A48 offers 4 inches, making Spice Xlife 514Q the larger display of the two. Both Lava A48 and Spice Xlife 514Q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Spice Xlife 514Q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava A48 offers 2 MP, making Spice Xlife 514Q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Spice Xlife 514Q offers a higher front camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Lava A48 offers 0.3 MP, making Spice Xlife 514Q better for front camera photography.
Battery: Spice Xlife 514Q offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Lava A48 offers 1300 mAh, making Spice Xlife 514Q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Spice Xlife 514Q offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Lava A48 offers 4 GB, making Spice Xlife 514Q the better option for storage.
User Rating: Spice Xlife 514Q receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Lava A48 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Lava A48
₹2,399
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Spice Xlife 514Q
₹3,659
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
10 Jun, 2016
|
18 Aug, 2016
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6580
|
N/A
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
3.2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1300 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(864 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(5 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6580
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.56 %
|
N/A
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
125.8 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.9 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
116.4 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
326 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1300 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|