|
71%
Lava Blaze Pro
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Blaze Pro vs Moto G32
Comparing the Lava Blaze Pro vs Moto G32 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G32 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,582, while Lava Blaze Pro scores 949, making Moto G32 the better performer.
Display: Both Lava Blaze Pro and Moto G32 offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Blaze Pro and Moto G32 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G32 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Lava Blaze Pro offers 8 MP, making Moto G32 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G32 delivers longer battery life with 19h 40m, while Lava Blaze Pro delivers 10h 34m, making Moto G32 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Lava Blaze Pro and Moto G32 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Moto G32 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Lava Blaze Pro has a rating of 4.1.
|
Lava Blaze Pro
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Moto G32
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
20 Sep, 2022
|
09 Aug, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G37
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
0.3 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
33W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expert Review
|
7.6/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(529 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(45,976 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
119,127
AnTuTu Score
|
245,680
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 34m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 40m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 20, 2022
(Official)
|
Aug 09, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
1 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G37
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
119,127
|
245,680
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
36.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
20.3 %
|
44.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.17 %
|
85.48 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
89.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.7 mm
|
161.7 mm
|
Width
|
76.3 mm
|
73.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
184 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera6x Digital Zoomf/1.80.64µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
0.3 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
6 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Macro Video |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 33W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 34m
|
19h 40m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 35m 5s
|
2h 8m 58s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.84 W/kg Body: 1.07 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,999
|