|
71%
Lava Bold N1 Pro
₹11,499
|
89%
iQOO Neo 10R
₹23,926
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Bold N1 Pro vs iQOO Neo 10R
Comparing the Lava Bold N1 Pro vs iQOO Neo 10R across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Neo 10R scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,139, while Lava Bold N1 Pro scores 1,367, making iQOO Neo 10R the better performer.
Display: iQOO Neo 10R offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while Lava Bold N1 Pro offers 6.67 inches, making iQOO Neo 10R the larger display of the two. iQOO Neo 10R features a AMOLED display compared to Lava Bold N1 Pro's IPS LCD, making iQOO Neo 10R the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Lava Bold N1 Pro and iQOO Neo 10R feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: iQOO Neo 10R offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Lava Bold N1 Pro offers 8 MP, making iQOO Neo 10R better for front camera photography.
Battery: iQOO Neo 10R delivers longer battery life with 16h 22m, while Lava Bold N1 Pro delivers 11h 17m, making iQOO Neo 10R the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Lava Bold N1 Pro and iQOO Neo 10R offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: iQOO Neo 10R receives a higher expert rating of 8.1 from the editorial team, while Lava Bold N1 Pro is rated 7.5.
User Rating: iQOO Neo 10R receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Lava Bold N1 Pro has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Lava Bold N1 Pro
₹11,499
@ Flipkart
|
✕
iQOO Neo 10R
₹23,926
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
71%
|
89%
|
Release Date
|
02 Jun, 2025
|
11 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T606
|
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6400 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
80W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
8.1/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(2,061 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(14,277 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
241,398
AnTuTu Score
|
1,476,651
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 17m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹11,499
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 02, 2025
(Official)
|
Mar 11, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v14
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T606
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
3 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A520 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57
|
Adreno 735
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
241,398
|
1,476,651
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
18.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.3 %
|
33.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
4500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
263 ppi
|
453 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.92 %
|
89.34 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
93.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
165.8 mm
|
163.72 mm
|
Width
|
77.2 mm
|
75.88 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.35 mm
|
7.98 mm
|
Weight
|
200 grams
|
196 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Yes Splash proof IP65
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size IMX882 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) SuperMoon |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @60 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
32 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 80W Flash Charging 50% in 26 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 17m
|
16h 22m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 25m 44s
|
0h 43m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.97 W/kg Body: 0.96 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz 6GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹11,499
|
Not Available in any store
|