|
72%
Lava Bold N2 Pro
₹123,131
|
96%
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Bold N2 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra
Comparing the Lava Bold N2 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra runs at a higher processing speed of 4.74 GHz, while Lava Bold N2 Pro runs at 1.8 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra offers a screen size of 8 inches, while Lava Bold N2 Pro offers 6.75 inches, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra features a Dynamic AMOLED 2x display compared to Lava Bold N2 Pro's LCD, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra offers a higher rear camera resolution with 200 MP, while Lava Bold N2 Pro offers 50 MP, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra offers a higher front camera resolution with 10 MP, while Lava Bold N2 Pro offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Lava Bold N2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Lava Bold N2 Pro offers 128 GB, making Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra the better option for storage.
|
✕
Lava Bold N2 Pro
₹123,131
@ Amazon
|
✕
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
96%
|
Release Date
|
06 Apr, 2026
|
23 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 4.74 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
12 GB RAM
|
Main Display
|
|
|
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
8 inches (20.32 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
Dynamic AMOLED 2x
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
2256x2504 px
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Cover Display
|
N/A
|
6.49 inches (16.48 cm)
|
|
N/A
|
1080x2520 px (FHD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
200 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
10 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
10 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W
|
45W
|
|
N/A
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 4.x
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3/5
(17 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
3,074,056
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
20h 46m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹123,131
|
₹199,999
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 31, 2026
(Official)
|
Jul 22, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android
|
OS Updates
|
1 Year
|
7 Year
|
Security Updates
|
2 Year
|
7 Year
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T7250
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
4.74 GHz, Dual core, Oryon 3.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57
|
Adreno 840
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
12 GB / 16 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
3,074,056
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
18.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
5,392
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
Dynamic AMOLED 2x
|
Screen Size
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
8 inches (20.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
2256x2504 px
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
3000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
422 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
90.51 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.1 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
158.4 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
72.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
201 grams
|
215 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Gorilla Glass Victus 2
|
Form Factor
|
N/A
|
Foldable Touch
|
Dimensions
|
N/A
|
Folded: 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm
Unfolded: 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1 mm |
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Best In Class
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera |
200 MP
Primary Camera30x Digital Zoomf/1.7 Wide Angle 85° field-of-view23 mm focal length 1/1.3" sensor size S5KHP2 0.6µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/1.9 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/2.5" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
10 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera67 mm focal length 1/3.94" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Quad Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
12288 x 16384 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
30 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
8k @30 fps
4k @120 fps Full HD @120/240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Slow Motion
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
10 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
N/A
|
Si/C Li-Ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W
|
Yes 45W
|
Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 20W Wireless Charging
|
Wireless Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 4.5W Wireless Reverse Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
20h 46m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB / 512 GB / 1 TB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 4.x
|
Expandable Storage
|
N/A
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano/eSIM SIM2: eSIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 7009(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N12 / N20 / N25 / N26 / N28 / N66
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/be/ax) 5GHz 6GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v6.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Barometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹123,131
|
₹199,999
|