Lava Virat V1 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

Comparing the Lava Virat V1 5G vs Motorola Edge 70 Fusion across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 3,475, while Lava Virat V1 5G scores 1,699, making Motorola Edge 70 Fusion the better performer.

Display: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 6.75 inches, making Motorola Edge 70 Fusion the larger display of the two. Motorola Edge 70 Fusion features a Extreme AMOLED display compared to Lava Virat V1 5G's LCD, making Motorola Edge 70 Fusion the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 13 MP, making Motorola Edge 70 Fusion better for rear camera photography.

Front Camera: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 5 MP, making Motorola Edge 70 Fusion better for front camera photography.

Battery: Lava Virat V1 5G delivers longer battery life with 21h 27m, while Motorola Edge 70 Fusion delivers 17h 34m, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Lava Virat V1 5G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola Edge 70 Fusion offers 128 GB, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better option for storage.

Expert Review: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion receives a higher expert rating of 8.4 from the editorial team, while Lava Virat V1 5G is rated 8.

User Rating: Motorola Edge 70 Fusion receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Lava Virat V1 5G has a rating of 4.2.

Lava Virat V1 5G

₹13,799

@ Amazon

Motorola Edge 70 Fusion

₹29,199

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

74%

85%

Release Date

28 Jul, 2026

12 Mar, 2026

Performance


Unisoc T8200	Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)
4 GB RAM	8 GB RAM

Display


6.75 inches (17.15 cm)	6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
LCD	Extreme AMOLED
720x1600 px (HD+)	Super HD (2772 x 1272)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	144 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


13 MP Primary Camera	50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera
N/A	13 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

Front Camera


5 MP	32 MP

Battery


6000 mAh	7000 mAh
10W	68W Turbo Power Charging
No Wireless Charging	N/A

Storage

64 GB	128 GB
UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1

Expert Review

8.0/10

Read Expert Review

8.4/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Distinct geometric rear design
Serviceable performance
Bloatware-free software
Great battery life

Long-lasting battery life
Slim and lightweight design
Reliable cameras
Dependable performance

Cons

Slow charging speeds
Misses out on key AI features

Warms up quickly during gaming
Macro photography could be improved

User Ratings

4.2/5

(455 ratings)

4.4/5

(17,139 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

515,146 AnTuTu Score	1,149,292 AnTuTu Score
21h 27m Battery Life (PC Mark)	17h 34m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹13,799

@ Amazon

₹29,199

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Jul 24, 2026

(Official)

Mar 06, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

OS Updates

1 Year

3 Years

Security Updates

2 Year

5 Year

Custom UI

N/A

Hello UI

Performance

Performance Rating

Good

Very Good

Chipset

Unisoc T8200

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4

View Details

Processor

Octa core

2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A76 2.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A76 2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55

Octa core

2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.4 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

6 nm

4 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Mali-G57 MP4

Adreno 810

RAM

4 GB	8 GB / 12 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X

LPDDR5X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

515,146

1,149,292

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

20.0 s

18.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

312

1,197

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

N/A

5.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

N/A

19.0 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Best In Class

Display Type

LCD	Extreme AMOLED

Screen Size

6.75 inches (17.15 cm)

6.8 inches (17.27 cm)

Resolution

720x1600 px (HD+)

1272x2772 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

N/A

5200 nits

HBM Brightness

N/A

1600 nits

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

144 Hz

Touch Sampling Rate

N/A

1500 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

260 ppi

449 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

86.36 %

92.05 %

Screen Protection

Yes	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i

Bezel-less Display

N/A	Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

N/A	Yes HDR 10+

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

N/A

96.2 %

Design

Height

165.85 mm

162.76 mm

Width

76.8 mm

75.60 mm

Thickness

8.75 mm

7.99 mm

Weight

210 grams

193 grams

Build Material

N/A	Back: Fiber Fabric

Water Resistance

Yes Splash proof IP64

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Good

Very Good

Resolution

13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle1/1.56" sensor size LYT 710 1µm pixel size

N/A	13 MP f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size

Autofocus

N/A	Yes Multi-directional Phase Detection Autofocus

OIS

N/A

Yes

Flash

Yes	Yes LED Flash

Shooting Modes

High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Macro Mode

Camera Features

Filters

Face detection

Video Recording

Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps
720x480 @30 fps

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps

Video Recording Features

Slow Motion

Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion
Audio Zoom

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Good

Very Good

Resolution

5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera

32 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera0.7µm pixel size

Flash

Yes Screen flash

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Capacity

6000 mAh

7000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

Silicon Carbon

TalkTime

Up to 47 Hours(2G)

N/A

Quick Charging

Yes 10W Charging Time: 185 minutes

Yes 68W Turbo Power Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

21h 27m

17h 34m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

3h 7m

49m

Storage

Internal Storage

64 GB

128 GB / 256 GB / 512 GB

Storage Type

UFS 2.2

UFS 3.1

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 1 TB

N/A

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

N/A	5G Bands: FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N75 TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1500(band 32) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 7009(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26)

SIM 2

N/A	5G Bands: FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N26 / N28 / N66 / N75 TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78

N/A

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 1500(band 32) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26)