|
74%
Lava Virat V1 5G
₹13,799
@Amazon
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,790
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Virat V1 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the Lava Virat V1 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,961, while Lava Virat V1 5G scores 1,699, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Lava Virat V1 5G offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 6.7 inches, making Lava Virat V1 5G the larger display of the two. Both Lava Virat V1 5G and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 13 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 5 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Virat V1 5G delivers longer battery life with 21h 27m, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G delivers 12h 51m, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Lava Virat V1 5G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while Lava Virat V1 5G is rated 8.
User Rating: Lava Virat V1 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Lava Virat V1 5G
₹13,799
@ Amazon
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,790
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
28 Jul, 2026
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T8200
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
10W
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(455 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(10,451 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
515,146
AnTuTu Score
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
21h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹13,799
@ Amazon
|
₹15,790
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 24, 2026
(Official)
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
1 Year
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
2 Year
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T8200
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A76 2.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A76 2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MP4
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
515,146
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
312
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.36 %
|
83.65 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with notch
|
Design
Height
|
165.85 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
76.8 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.75 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
210 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Filters
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps 720x480 @30 fps |
HD @120 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Slow Motion
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 47 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 10W Charging Time: 185 minutes
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
21h 27m
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
3h 7m
|
1h 14m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹13,799
@ Amazon
|
₹15,790
@ Amazon
|
Related Comparisons
Lava Virat V1 5G
Lava Bold N2 5G
Lava Virat V1 5G
Lava Virat V1 Pro 5G
Lava Virat V1 5G
Ai+ Nova 2 5G
Lava Virat V1 5G
boltt ACE 5G
Lava Virat V1 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Lava Virat V1 5G
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
Lava Virat V1 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Lava Virat V1 5G
iQOO Z11 Lite 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A07 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Moto G37 Power 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F16 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Itel Zeno 100 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M06 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Moto G37 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Samsung Galaxy M36