|
68%
Lava Z93
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus
₹5,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lava Z93 vs Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus
Comparing the Lava Z93 vs Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Z93 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus runs at 1.5 GHz, making Lava Z93 the better performer.
Display: Lava Z93 offers a screen size of 6.22 inches, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 6.1 inches, making Lava Z93 the larger display of the two. Both Lava Z93 and Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Lava Z93 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 8 MP, making Lava Z93 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Lava Z93 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 5 MP, making Lava Z93 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Z93 offers a higher battery capacity with 3500 mAh, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 3000 mAh, making Lava Z93 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Z93 offers higher internal storage with 32 GB, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 16 GB, making Lava Z93 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Z93 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Lava Z93
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus
₹5,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
68%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
22 Aug, 2019
|
20 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
N/A
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.5 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.1 inches (15.49 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
600x1280 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
3500 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(55 ratings)
|
3.3/5
(377 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
79,138
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
14h 17m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Jan 20, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
79,138
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.1 inches (15.49 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
600x1280 px
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
232 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.59 %
|
81.68 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
156.6 mm
|
155.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
72.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
9.7 mm
|
Weight
|
159.2 grams
|
163.5 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Soft light flash
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 12 Hours(2G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 17m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 5s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.1
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|