|
53%
Lenovo RocStar A319
₹6,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Iris X1 Mini
₹4,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lenovo RocStar A319 vs Lava Iris X1 Mini
Comparing the Lenovo RocStar A319 vs Lava Iris X1 Mini across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lenovo RocStar A319 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris X1 Mini runs at 1.2 GHz, making Lenovo RocStar A319 the better performer.
Display: Both Lenovo RocStar A319 and Lava Iris X1 Mini offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Lava Iris X1 Mini features a IPS LCD display compared to Lenovo RocStar A319's LCD, making Lava Iris X1 Mini the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Lenovo RocStar A319 and Lava Iris X1 Mini feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Lenovo RocStar A319 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava Iris X1 Mini offers 0.3 MP, making Lenovo RocStar A319 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Iris X1 Mini offers a higher battery capacity with 1750 mAh, while Lenovo RocStar A319 offers 1500 mAh, making Lava Iris X1 Mini better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Lenovo RocStar A319 and Lava Iris X1 Mini offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris X1 Mini receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Lenovo RocStar A319 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Lenovo RocStar A319
₹6,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Lava Iris X1 Mini
₹4,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
21 Oct, 2014
|
02 Feb, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1750 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(504 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(508 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 21, 2014
(Official)
|
Feb 02, 2015
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.8 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
123.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
63.8 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10.2 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1750 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 3.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Digital Dolby Digital Plus
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|