|
62%
Lenovo X910
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Lenovo X910 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Lenovo X910 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lenovo X910 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.2 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making Lenovo X910 the better performer.
Display: Lenovo X910 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Lenovo X910 the larger display of the two. Lenovo X910 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Lenovo X910 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Lenovo X910 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making Lenovo X910 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Lenovo X910 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lenovo X910 offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making Lenovo X910 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Lenovo X910 offers 16 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.
|
✕
Lenovo X910
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
62%
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 800
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 330
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
441 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
10.3 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|