M-Star Eco-99 vs UFX 101

Comparing the M-Star Eco-99 vs UFX 101 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both M-Star Eco-99 and UFX 101 feature a 1.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: M-Star Eco-99 offers a higher battery capacity with 1100 mAh, while UFX 101 offers 1000 mAh, making M-Star Eco-99 better for longer battery life.

M-Star Eco-99

(Discontinued)

UFX 101

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Jan, 2011

21 Jun, 2011

Display

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	N/A
N/A	176x220 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1100 mAh

1000 mAh

Storage

N/A

128 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

N/A	176x220 px

Pixel Density

N/A

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

29.09 %

Design

Height

N/A

110 mm

Width

N/A

47.6 mm

Thickness

N/A

12.20 mm

Weight

N/A

54 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1100 mAh

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

128 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Loud speakers Aux Attachment Which Can Play The Music with Home Theatre Like an I.Pod

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Loud Speaker

Sensors

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 200

MMS

Yes

N/A