Maxx GC 355 vs Philips Xenium X503

Comparing the Maxx GC 355 vs Philips Xenium X503 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Maxx GC 355 and Philips Xenium X503 offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches.

Rear Camera: Philips Xenium X503 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Maxx GC 355 offers 1.3 MP, making Philips Xenium X503 better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Maxx GC 355 offers a higher battery capacity with 1100 mAh, while Philips Xenium X503 offers 1000 mAh, making Maxx GC 355 better for longer battery life.

Maxx GC 355

(Discontinued)

Philips Xenium X503

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	15 May, 2010

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Screen Size

2.40 inches (6.1 cm)

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

N/A	240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

31.49 %

Design

Height

N/A

114.5 mm

Width

N/A

49.5 mm

Thickness

N/A

11.00 mm

Weight

N/A	92.8 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

3.2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

N/A	220x176 @ 10

Battery

Capacity

1100 mAh

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3.5(2G)

Up to 8(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 4 GB

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Yes v2

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 WAV aAAC+ WMA - 3.5 MM Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes	Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

unlimited

1000 entries Photocall

SMS

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

Anti Theft Call Cheater

Chinese-English Dictionary Voice Memo Predictive Text Input Alarm Clock Calender Calculator