Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Meizu M2 vs Oye MAS
Comparing the Meizu M2 vs Oye MAS across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Meizu M2 and Oye MAS run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Both Meizu M2 and Oye MAS offer the same screen size of 5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Meizu M2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Oye MAS offers 8 MP, making Meizu M2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Meizu M2 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Oye MAS offers 2 MP, making Meizu M2 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Meizu M2 offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while Oye MAS offers 1800 mAh, making Meizu M2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Oye MAS offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Meizu M2 offers 16 GB, making Oye MAS the better option for storage.
Summary
Spec Score
|
65%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
12 Oct, 2015
|
25 Aug, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2500 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(625 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
32 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
1 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
220 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
71.28 %
|
66.25 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
140 mm
|
142.8 mm
|
Width
|
68.9 mm
|
72.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
131 grams
|
180 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Touch to focus |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
1800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 5.5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|