Mercury F3 vs Micromax X103

Comparing the Mercury F3 vs Micromax X103 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Mercury F3 and Micromax X103 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Mercury F3 offers a higher battery capacity with 850 mAh, while Micromax X103 offers 1750 mAh, making Mercury F3 better for longer battery life.

Mercury F3

(Discontinued)

Micromax X103

₹1,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

10 Aug, 2010

N/A

Display

2 inches (5.08 cm)	N/A
LCD	LCD
N/A	128x160 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

850 mAh

1750 mAh

User Ratings

N/A	3.9/5 (1,258 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2 inches (5.08 cm)

N/A

Resolution

N/A	128x160 px

Design

Height

108.8 mm

111 mm

Width

46.5 mm

46 mm

Thickness

13.65 mm

16.00 mm

Weight

74 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

850 mAh

1750 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 5(2G)

Up to 7(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Loud External Speaker

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes

SMS

Yes

MMS

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

N/A	Calendar Calculator Alarm Clock