Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3
₹3,990
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 offers a screen size of 4.3 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 and Lava Iris 406q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 offers 2 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 offers 1350 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 GB, making Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3 and Lava Iris 406q both receive the same user rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Micromax A65 Smarty 4.3
₹3,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
17 Jan, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
1350 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(128 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
SC6820
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A5
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
217 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
58.08 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
130 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
69.7 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.95 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
148 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
352x288 fps
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Capacity
|
1350 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
Hook up M!zone+ Mlive Cricket Fever
|
N/A
|