|
53%
Micromax A92 Canvas Lite
₹6,500
(Discontinued)
|
XOLO Q600
₹6,935
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax A92 Canvas Lite vs XOLO Q600
Comparing the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite vs XOLO Q600 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q600 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Micromax A92 Canvas Lite runs at 1.0 GHz, making XOLO Q600 the better performer.
Display: Micromax A92 Canvas Lite offers a screen size of 5 inches, while XOLO Q600 offers 4.5 inches, making Micromax A92 Canvas Lite the larger display of the two. Both Micromax A92 Canvas Lite and XOLO Q600 feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Both Micromax A92 Canvas Lite and XOLO Q600 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Micromax A92 Canvas Lite and XOLO Q600 feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both Micromax A92 Canvas Lite and XOLO Q600 offer the same 2000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Micromax A92 Canvas Lite and XOLO Q600 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Micromax A92 Canvas Lite receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while XOLO Q600 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
Micromax A92 Canvas Lite
₹6,500
(Discontinued)
|
✕
XOLO Q600
₹6,935
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
53%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
28 Jun, 2013
|
01 Jul, 2013
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
MediaTek MT6589M
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2000 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(181 ratings)
|
3.5/5
(180 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jul 01, 2013
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.1.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
MediaTek MT6589M
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A9
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 531 Ultra
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
187 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.87 %
|
62.37 %
|
Design
Height
|
147 mm
|
133.5 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
67 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.8 mm
|
11.9 mm
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoom |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
5 x Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6.5 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 10 Hours(3G) / Up to 13.4 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
SIM1: Mini
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.77 W/kg Body: 0.87 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|