Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 and Lava Iris 406q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 offers a higher battery capacity with 1850 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500 has a rating of 2.9.
|
✕
Micromax Canvas Blaze MT500
₹6,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|