Micromax GC256 vs Fly Ezzy Flip

Comparing the Micromax GC256 vs Fly Ezzy Flip across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Micromax GC256 and Fly Ezzy Flip feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Fly Ezzy Flip offers a higher battery capacity with 800 mAh, while Micromax GC256 offers 1000 mAh, making Fly Ezzy Flip better for longer battery life.

Micromax GC256

₹3,525

(Discontinued)

Fly Ezzy Flip

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

27 Sep, 2010

09 Nov, 2011

User Ratings

3.8/5

(10 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

1.8 inches (4.57 cm)

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

128x160 px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

114 ppi

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.72 %

30.59 %

Design

Height

103.2 mm

99.4 mm

Width

45.5 mm

50.1 mm

Thickness

15.10 mm

19.70 mm

Weight

83 grams

75 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

0.1 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

800 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 2(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

45 KB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 1 GB

Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 MIDI AMR WAV with Playlists Playback Time : Up to 9 hours

Sensors

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 500 Entries + SIM1 + SIM2 Photo ID Melody ID

SMS

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

STK/UTK

Calendar Alarm clock Tasks Reminder Auto on/off Calculator