Micromax Q3 ezpad vs Forme X2

Comparing the Micromax Q3 ezpad vs Forme X2 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q3 ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Forme X2 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q3 ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Forme X2 offers a higher battery capacity with 1200 mAh, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Forme X2 better for longer battery life.

Micromax Q3 ezpad

(Discontinued)

Forme X2

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

15 Jun, 2009

06 Jul, 2011

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	LCD
176x220 px	N/A

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

1200 mAh

Storage

10 MB

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

176x220 px

N/A

Pixel Density

128 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

22.38 %

N/A

Design

Height

111.2 mm

108.0 mm

Width

61.2 mm

46.6 mm

Thickness

13.00 mm

13.90 mm

Weight

97 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

1200 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

10 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 2 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

1000 entries Photocall

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

Voice memo T9

N/A