Micromax Q3 ezpad vs Mi-Fone Mi-Q

Comparing the Micromax Q3 ezpad vs Mi-Fone Mi-Q across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax Q3 ezpad and Mi-Fone Mi-Q offer the same screen size of 2.2 inches.

Rear Camera: Micromax Q3 ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Mi-Fone Mi-Q offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q3 ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Both Micromax Q3 ezpad and Mi-Fone Mi-Q offer the same 1000 mAh battery capacity.

Micromax Q3 ezpad

(Discontinued)

Mi-Fone Mi-Q

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

15 Jun, 2009

N/A

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	N/A
176x220 px	176x220 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

Storage

10 MB

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

176x220 px

Pixel Density

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

22.38 %

23.56 %

Design

Height

111.2 mm

106 mm

Width

61.2 mm

61 mm

Thickness

13.00 mm

15.00 mm

Weight

97 grams

89 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

10 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 2 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

1000 entries Photocall

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Voice memo T9

Organiser Clock Alarm