Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Gild 6600

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Gild 6600 across display and camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Gild 6600 offer the same screen size of 2.2 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Gild 6600 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Gild 6600

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

25 Nov, 2010

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	LCD
240x320 px	176x220 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

N/A

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

182 ppi

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

27.27 %

Design

Height

114 mm

Width

60 mm

49 mm

Thickness

10.40 mm

15.90 mm

Weight

96 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

N/A

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 6(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes 300 Entries

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

N/A