Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Gild S83

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Gild S83 across display and camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Gild S83 offers a screen size of 2.4 inches, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 2.2 inches, making Gild S83 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Gild S83 feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Gild S83 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Gild S83

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

26 May, 2010

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
LCD	LCD
240x320 px	N/A

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

N/A

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

N/A

Design

Height

114 mm

116 mm

Width

60 mm

50 mm

Thickness

10.40 mm

17.00 mm

Weight

96 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

N/A

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 6(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes Integrated MP3 Player with Large Speaker

Sensors

Games

N/A	Shaking Games

Java

Yes

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

N/A	Shake to change wallpaper/MP3