Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs M-Star Slide-66

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs M-Star Slide-66 across display and camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and M-Star Slide-66 offer the same screen size of 2.2 inches.

Rear Camera: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while M-Star Slide-66 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

M-Star Slide-66

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

07 Jan, 2011

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	N/A
240x320 px	N/A

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

N/A

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

N/A

Design

Height

114 mm

N/A

Width

60 mm

N/A

Thickness

10.40 mm

N/A

Weight

96 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes	Yes Flash LED Flash

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

N/A

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

N/A

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A

EMS