Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Spice QT-65

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Spice QT-65 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Spice QT-65 offer the same screen size of 2.2 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Spice QT-65 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Spice QT-65 offers a higher battery capacity with 1100 mAh, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Spice QT-65 better for longer battery life.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Spice QT-65

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

16 Nov, 2010

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

N/A

Design

Height

114 mm

112 mm

Width

60 mm

Thickness

10.40 mm

11.80 mm

Weight

96 grams

98.5 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes	Yes Flash LED Flash

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

N/A

128x96

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

1100 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

25 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Yes v2.1

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes 3000 Entries

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Internal Antenna Predictive Text Incoming Call Guard World Clock (Format12/24) Alarm Calculator Currency Convertor Calendar To-Do List Caller Group Auto Power On/Off