Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Sunpillar SP2102-3

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Sunpillar SP2102-3 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a screen size of 2.2 inches, while Sunpillar SP2102-3 offers 1.8 inches, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad the larger display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Sunpillar SP2102-3 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Sunpillar SP2102-3 offers a higher battery capacity with 950 mAh, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Sunpillar SP2102-3 better for longer battery life.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Sunpillar SP2102-3

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

17 Oct, 2010

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	1.8 inches (4.57 cm)
LCD	N/A
240x320 px	N/A

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

950 mAh

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

1.8 inches (4.57 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

N/A

Design

Height

114 mm

N/A

Width

60 mm

N/A

Thickness

10.40 mm

N/A

Weight

96 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

950 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 8(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Sound Recording and 3D Stereo Speaker

Sensors

Java

Yes

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes