Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Sunpillar SP2103

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs Sunpillar SP2103 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a screen size of 2.2 inches, while Sunpillar SP2103 offers 1.8 inches, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad the larger display of the two. Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Sunpillar SP2103 feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax Q50 Ezpad and Sunpillar SP2103 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Sunpillar SP2103 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making Sunpillar SP2103 better for longer battery life.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Sunpillar SP2103

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

17 Oct, 2010

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	1.8 inches (4.57 cm)
LCD	LCD
240x320 px	N/A

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1000 mAh

1500 mAh

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

1.8 inches (4.57 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

N/A

Design

Height

114 mm

108 mm

Width

60 mm

48 mm

Thickness

10.40 mm

14.30 mm

Weight

96 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

1500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 8(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Stereo Speaker

Sensors

Java

Yes

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes