Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs iBall Floater

Comparing the Micromax Q50 Ezpad vs iBall Floater across display and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a screen size of 2.2 inches, while iBall Floater offers 1.4 inches, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad the larger display of the two.

Battery: iBall Floater offers a higher battery capacity with 650 mAh, while Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers 1000 mAh, making iBall Floater better for longer battery life.

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

iBall Floater

₹2,999

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 Oct, 2010

10 Nov, 2010

Display

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)	1.4 inches (3.56 cm)
LCD	N/A
240x320 px	N/A

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

N/A

Battery

1000 mAh

650 mAh

Storage

N/A

32 MB

User Ratings

3.5/5

(17 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

1.4 inches (3.56 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

21.93 %

N/A

Design

Height

114 mm

N/A

Width

60 mm

N/A

Thickness

10.40 mm

N/A

Weight

96 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

N/A

Flash

Yes

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

650 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

32 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: No

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes 500 Entries with Blacklist

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes SMS Storage 100 SMS Blacklist

MMS

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

N/A	Alarm with Ringtone alert Calendar & Scheduler Clock and World time Calculator and Unit Converter Memo Book Stopwatch