Micromax Q75 vs Infibeam I500

Comparing the Micromax Q75 vs Infibeam I500 across display, camera, battery and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Infibeam I500 offers a screen size of 3.2 inches, while Micromax Q75 offers 2.4 inches, making Infibeam I500 the larger display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax Q75 and Infibeam I500 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Micromax Q75 offers a higher battery capacity with 1200 mAh, while Infibeam I500 offers 1100 mAh, making Micromax Q75 better for longer battery life.

User Rating: Infibeam I500 receives a higher user rating of 4, while Micromax Q75 has a rating of 3.5.

Micromax Q75

(Discontinued)

Infibeam I500

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

02 Sep, 2010

10 Aug, 2010

User Ratings

3.5/5

(120 ratings)

4/5

(1 rating)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

3.2 inches (8.13 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

N/A

Pixel Density

167 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

24.06 %

N/A

Design

Height

115 mm

113.5 mm

Width

64.5 mm

55 mm

Thickness

12.20 mm

13.00 mm

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Image Resolution

N/A	1600 x 1200 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Front Camera

Resolution

N/A	0.3 MP Front Camera

Battery

Capacity

1200 mAh

1100 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 7(2G)

N/A

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

N/A

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV) with Background Music Playback

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 1000

Yes

MMS

Yes

Email

Yes Zenga Mail

N/A

Other Facilities

EMS STK

N/A