Micromax X103 vs Philips E133

Comparing the Micromax X103 vs Philips E133 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Micromax X103 and Philips E133 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Philips E133 offers a higher battery capacity with 800 mAh, while Micromax X103 offers 1750 mAh, making Philips E133 better for longer battery life.

Micromax X103

₹1,499

(Discontinued)

Philips E133

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	16 Nov, 2012

Display

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	LCD
128x160 px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1750 mAh

800 mAh

User Ratings

3.9/5

(1,258 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

128x160 px

320x240 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

23.42 %

Design

Height

111 mm

105 mm

Width

46 mm

61 mm

Thickness

16.00 mm

13.60 mm

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1750 mAh

800 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 7(2G)

Up to 6.66(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 4 GB

Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Yes v2

Multimedia

Video Player

N/A	Yes Video Formats: MPEG4 H.263 3GP

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : AMR Midi MP3 AAC Audio Recording Loud Speaker 3.5mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes Photocall

SMS

Yes	Yes Threaded View

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Calendar Calculator Alarm Clock

Organizer Voice memo Predictive text input