Micromax X250 vs Aroma AD335

Comparing the Micromax X250 vs Aroma AD335 across display and camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax X250 and Aroma AD335 offer the same screen size of 2 inches.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax X250 and Aroma AD335 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Micromax X250

₹3,999

(Discontinued)

Aroma AD335

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

17 May, 2009

14 Sep, 2010

Display

2 inches (5.08 cm)	2 inches (5.08 cm)
N/A	LCD
176x220 px	N/A

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1300 mAh

N/A

Storage

500 KB

N/A

User Ratings

1/5

(2 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Screen Size

2 inches (5.08 cm)

Resolution

176x220 px

N/A

Pixel Density

141 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

24.35 %

N/A

Design

Height

110 mm

N/A

Width

47 mm

N/A

Thickness

15.20 mm

N/A

Weight

76 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

1300 mAh

N/A

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

TalkTime

Up to 10(2G)

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

500 KB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player with Vibration Speakers (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multiformat Music Player

Sensors

Games

4 Preloaded Games

N/A

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 500 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 185

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Twin LED Torch Light Motion Sensor Clock Alarm Image Viewer/Organiser

N/A