Micromax X260 vs Nokia C200

Share  

Comparing the Micromax X260 vs Nokia C200 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Nokia C200 offers a screen size of 6.09 inches, while Micromax X260 offers 2.2 inches, making Nokia C200 the larger display of the two.


Rear Camera: Nokia C200 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Micromax X260 offers 0.3 MP, making Nokia C200 better for rear camera photography.


Battery: Nokia C200 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while Micromax X260 offers 1300 mAh, making Nokia C200 better for longer battery life.

...read more
✕
Micromax X260
Micromax X260
Micromax X260
Micromax X260
₹2,460
(Discontinued)
✕
Nokia C200
Nokia C200
Nokia C200
Nokia C200
₹9,090
(Not Released in India)
Add to Compare

Summary

Spec Score

N/A
66%

Release Date

23 Oct, 2009
25 Dec, 2022

Performance

N/A
N/A
MediaTek Helio A22
N/A
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
N/A
3 GB RAM

Display

N/A
2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
6.09 inches (15.47 cm)
N/A
IPS LCD
176x220 px
720x1560 px (HD+)

Rear Camera

N/A
0.3 MP
Primary Camera
13 MP
Primary Camera

Front Camera

N/A
N/A
8 MP

Battery

N/A
1300 mAh
4000 mAh
N/A
No Wireless Charging

Storage

N/A
32 GB
N/A
eMMC 5.1

User Feedback

General

Operating System

N/A
Android v12

Performance

Performance Rating

N/A
Avg

Chipset

N/A
MediaTek Helio A22

Processor

N/A
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53

Architecture (The higher, the better)

N/A
64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

N/A
12 nm

Graphics (GPU)

N/A
PowerVR GE8300

RAM

N/A
3 GB

Display

Display Rating

N/A
Excellent

Display Type

N/A
IPS LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches  (5.59 cm)
6.09 inches  (15.47 cm)

Resolution

176x220 px
720x1560 px (HD+)

Aspect Ratio

N/A
19.5:9

Pixel Density

128 ppi
282 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

29.46 %
79.41 %

Bezel-less Display

N/A
Yes with waterdrop notch

Design

Height

110 mm
156.5 mm

Width

47 mm
73.1 mm

Thickness

15.20 mm
8.8 mm

Weight

75 grams
172.5 grams

Water Resistance

N/A
Yes Splash proof IP52

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

N/A
Avg

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera
13 MP
Primary Camera

Autofocus

N/A
Yes

Flash

Yes
Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

N/A
4128 x 3096 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash

Video Recording

N/A
1920x1080 @ 30 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

N/A
Good

Resolution

N/A
8 MP
Primary Camera

Camera Features

N/A
Fixed Focus

Video Recording

N/A
1920x1080 @ 30 fps

Battery

Battery Rating

N/A
Very Good

Capacity

1300 mAh
4000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion
Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 10(2G)
N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A
32 GB

Storage Type

N/A
eMMC 5.1

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 2 GB
Yes Up to 256 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM
Dual SIM

SIM Type

N/A
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G Not Supported
5G Not Supported 4G

VoLTE

N/A
Yes

SIM 1

N/A
4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13)

SIM 2

N/A
4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13)

Wi-Fi

No
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)

Wi-Fi Features

N/A
Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes
Yes v5.0

GPS

N/A
Yes with A-GPS

NFC

N/A
No

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A
3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player with Vibration Speakers (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback
N/A

Sensors

Other Sensors

N/A
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Barometer

Games

2 preloaded games
N/A

Java

No
N/A

Browser

Yes
N/A

Phone Book

Yes 500 Entries
N/A

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 200
N/A

MMS

Yes
N/A

Other Facilities

5-way navigation key Motion Sensor Torch Light : Yes (Twin LED) Flight Mode Conference Call Speed Dial STK
N/A
Mobiles› Compare Mobiles› Micromax X260 vs Nokia C200