Micromax X264 vs Maximus M218M

Comparing the Micromax X264 vs Maximus M218M across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax X264 and Maximus M218M offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches and feature the same TFT display.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax X264 and Maximus M218M feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Micromax X264 offers a higher battery capacity with 900 mAh, while Maximus M218M offers 1000 mAh, making Micromax X264 better for longer battery life.

Micromax X264

₹1,379

(Discontinued)

Maximus M218M

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

02 Sep, 2013

26 Dec, 2013

Display

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
TFT	TFT
240x320 px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

900 mAh

1000 mAh

User Ratings

3.9/5

(374 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

TFT

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

30.87 %

N/A

Display Colour

65K

N/A

Design

Height

118 mm

N/A

Width

49 mm

N/A

Thickness

14.3 mm

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Image Resolution

640 x 480 Pixels

Camera Features

5 x Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

900 mAh

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

N/A	SIM1: Mini

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Bluetooth

Yes v3.0

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: AVI MPEG4

Yes Video Formats: MPEG4

Ring Tone

Music ringtones Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: MP3 WAV

Yes Music Formats: MP3

Special Features

Torch Light Multi Languages

N/A

Sensors

Games

Yes

Browser

Yes WAP

Phone Book

Yes Limited 450 entries

Yes Limited

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 150

N/A

Other Facilities

Calculator Stopwatch Calendar Alarm

N/A