Micromax X367 vs Rage Bold 2600

Comparing the Micromax X367 vs Rage Bold 2600 across display and camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax X367 and Rage Bold 2600 offer the same screen size of 2.8 inches and feature the same TFT display.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax X367 and Rage Bold 2600 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Micromax X367

(Discontinued)

Rage Bold 2600

₹1,265

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

15 Jan, 2014

24 Jan, 2014

User Ratings

3.1/5

(20 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Performance

Processor

, ARM9

N/A

RAM

64 MB

N/A

Display

Display Type

TFT

Screen Size

2.8 inches (7.11 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

143 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

39.15 %

N/A

Display Colour

262k

N/A

Design

Height

107 mm

N/A

Width

58 mm

N/A

Thickness

11 mm

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Image Resolution

640 x 480 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

900 mAh

N/A

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

TalkTime

Up to 3 Hours(2G)

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

64 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

N/A	SIM1: Mini

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Bluetooth

Yes v2.1

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

N/A

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: 3GP MPEG4

Yes Video Formats: MPEG4

Ring Tone

Music ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: MP3 WAV

Yes Music Formats: MP3

Special Features

Multi Languages Auto Call Recording

N/A

Sensors

Games

Yes

Browser

Yes WAP 2.0

Yes WAP

Phone Book

Yes Limited 500 entries Black List

Yes Limited

SMS

200

N/A

Email

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

Calculator Currency converter E-Book Reader Unit converter World clock Calendar Alarm Document viewer

N/A