Micromax X389 vs Philips E2103

Comparing the Micromax X389 vs Philips E2103 across display and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax X389 and Philips E2103 offer the same screen size of 1.77 inches and feature the same TFT display.

Battery: Both Micromax X389 and Philips E2103 offer the same 1000 mAh battery capacity.

Micromax X389

₹1,990

(Out of Stock)

Philips E2103

₹1,099

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

07 May, 2021

27 May, 2025

User Ratings

3.9/5

(3,361 ratings)

N/A

Compare Prices

Not Available in any store

₹1,099

@ Amazon

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

May 07, 2021

(Official)

May 27, 2025

(Official)

Performance

Chipset

N/A

Unisoc

RAM

N/A

4 MB

Display

Display Type

TFT

Screen Size

1.77 inches (4.5 cm)

Resolution

128x160 px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

116 ppi

226 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

18.58 %

Design

Height

N/A

113.5 mm

Width

N/A

46 mm

Thickness

N/A

14.5 mm

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

N/A

Flash

Yes Triple LED Flash

N/A

Image Resolution

640 x 480 Pixels

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

4 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: 3GP

Ring Tone

Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: MP3

Special Features

Torch Light

Sensors

Games

Yes

Phone Book

Yes Limited

Other Facilities

Calculator Calendar Alarm

Alarm Calculator Calendar Timer

Compare Prices

Not Available in any store

₹1,099

@ Amazon