Micromax X50 vs Intex Avatar 3D 2.0

Comparing the Micromax X50 vs Intex Avatar 3D 2.0 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Intex Avatar 3D 2.0 offers a screen size of 2.8 inches, while Micromax X50 offers 2.4 inches, making Intex Avatar 3D 2.0 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax X50 and Intex Avatar 3D 2.0 feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Micromax X50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Intex Avatar 3D 2.0 offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax X50 better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Micromax X50 offers a higher battery capacity with 900 mAh, while Intex Avatar 3D 2.0 offers 1100 mAh, making Micromax X50 better for longer battery life.

Micromax X50

(Discontinued)

Intex Avatar 3D 2.0

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	21 Jun, 2012

User Ratings

3.2/5

(49 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

2.8 inches (7.11 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

167 ppi

143 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

28.78 %

41.28 %

Design

Height

117.7 mm

107 mm

Width

52.7 mm

55 mm

Thickness

15.80 mm

12.00 mm

Weight

113 grams

125 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

900 mAh

1100 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

28 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 WAV MIDI with Audio Streaming

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player Audio Equalizer Sound Recording

Sensors

Java

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 500 Entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 100

MMS

Yes