Micromax X50 vs Malata QS502

Comparing the Micromax X50 vs Malata QS502 across display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax X50 and Malata QS502 offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Both Micromax X50 and Malata QS502 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Micromax X50 offers a higher battery capacity with 900 mAh, while Malata QS502 offers 1000 mAh, making Micromax X50 better for longer battery life.

Storage: Malata QS502 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Micromax X50 offers 28 GB, making Malata QS502 the better option for storage.

Micromax X50

(Discontinued)

Malata QS502

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Display

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
LCD	LCD
240x320 px	176x220 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

900 mAh

1000 mAh

Storage

28 MB

512 KB

User Ratings

3.2/5

(49 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

167 ppi

117 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

28.78 %

28.17 %

Design

Height

117.7 mm

110 mm

Width

52.7 mm

58.5 mm

Thickness

15.80 mm

12.80 mm

Weight

113 grams

110.5 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

900 mAh

1000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

28 MB

512 KB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 16 GB

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 WAV MIDI with Audio Streaming

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with 3.5mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

Yes

MMS

Yes