Micromax iOne
₹4,990
(Discontinued)
|
69%
Nokia 2.2
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax iOne vs Nokia 2.2
Comparing the Micromax iOne vs Nokia 2.2 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Nokia 2.2 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Micromax iOne runs at 1.6 GHz, making Nokia 2.2 the better performer.
Display: Nokia 2.2 offers a screen size of 5.71 inches, while Micromax iOne offers 5.45 inches, making Nokia 2.2 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax iOne and Nokia 2.2 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Nokia 2.2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Micromax iOne offers 5 MP, making Nokia 2.2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Micromax iOne and Nokia 2.2 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Nokia 2.2 offers a higher battery capacity with 3000 mAh, while Micromax iOne offers 2200 mAh, making Nokia 2.2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Micromax iOne and Nokia 2.2 offer the same internal storage of 16 GB.
User Rating: Micromax iOne receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while Nokia 2.2 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Micromax iOne
₹4,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Nokia 2.2
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
07 Jun, 2019
|
10 Jun, 2019
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Unisoc SC9863
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.45 inches (13.84 cm)
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
540x1132 px
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2200 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(5,773 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(4,883 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
65,184
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jun 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Android One
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc SC9863
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.6 GHz, Cortex A55
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR3
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
65,184
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
24.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.45 inches (13.84 cm)
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x1132 px
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
230 ppi
|
295 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
76.84 %
|
78.73 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
141 mm
|
145.9 mm
|
Width
|
69 mm
|
70.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
9.3 mm
|
Weight
|
120 grams
|
153 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2200 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 55m 45s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 400 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|