|
75%
Moto E7 Plus
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
iQOO Z9x
₹11,039
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto E7 Plus vs iQOO Z9x
Comparing the Moto E7 Plus vs iQOO Z9x across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Z9x scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,735, while Moto E7 Plus scores 1,231, making iQOO Z9x the better performer.
Display: iQOO Z9x offers a screen size of 6.72 inches, while Moto E7 Plus offers 6.5 inches, making iQOO Z9x the larger display of the two. Moto E7 Plus features a IPS LCD display compared to iQOO Z9x's LCD, making Moto E7 Plus the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iQOO Z9x offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Moto E7 Plus offers 48 MP, making iQOO Z9x better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Moto E7 Plus and iQOO Z9x feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto E7 Plus delivers longer battery life with 24h 10m, while iQOO Z9x delivers 20h 19m, making Moto E7 Plus the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Moto E7 Plus offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while iQOO Z9x offers 128 GB, making Moto E7 Plus the better option for storage.
Expert Review: iQOO Z9x receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Moto E7 Plus is rated 7.
User Rating: Moto E7 Plus receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while iQOO Z9x has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Moto E7 Plus
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
iQOO Z9x
₹11,039
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
23 Sep, 2020
|
21 May, 2024
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 460
|
Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(48,498 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(5,303 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
141,552
AnTuTu Score
|
552,168
AnTuTu Score
|
|
24h 10m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
20h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 23, 2020
(Official)
|
May 21, 2024
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v14
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 710
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
141,552
|
552,168
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
43.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
612
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.6 %
|
17.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.53 %
|
86.58 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
86 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
165.21 mm
|
165.70 mm
|
Width
|
75.73 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.18 mm
|
7.99 mm
|
Weight
|
200 grams
|
199 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.7 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view26 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size 1.6µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.05 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
24h 10m
|
20h 19m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 35m 23s
|
1h 52s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.00 W/kg Body: 1.41 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|