Moto G04
₹6,998
(Out of Stock)
|
Samsung Galaxy F04
₹11,499
|
vivo X300 Ultra
₹159,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G04 vs Samsung Galaxy F04
Comparing the Moto G04 vs Samsung Galaxy F04 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F04 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while Moto G04 runs at 1.6 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy F04 the better performer.
Display: Moto G04 offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Samsung Galaxy F04 offers 6.5 inches, making Moto G04 the larger display of the two. Moto G04 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F04's PLS LCD, making Moto G04 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Moto G04 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F04 offers 13 MP, making Moto G04 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Moto G04 and Samsung Galaxy F04 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both Moto G04 and Samsung Galaxy F04 offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Moto G04 and Samsung Galaxy F04 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Moto G04 and Samsung Galaxy F04 both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Moto G04
₹6,998
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F04
₹11,499
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
22 Feb, 2024
|
12 Jan, 2023
|
14 May, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T606
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 4.61 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
16 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
PLS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
200 MP
Primary Camera (upto 3.7x Optical Zoom)
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
200 MP
Telephoto Camera
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
|
50 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
6600 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
100W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
512 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
N/A
|
8.7/10
|
Pros
|
|
|
Cons
|
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(16,625 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(109,111 ratings)
|
4.6/5
(29 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
15h 10m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹11,499
|
₹159,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 22, 2024
(Official)
|
Jan 12, 2023
(Official)
|
May 06, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v14
|
Android v12
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
5 Year
|
Security Updates
|
2 Years
|
N/A
|
7 Year
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Best In Class
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T606
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SM8850-AC
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
4.61 GHz, Dual core, Oryon 3.62 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Adreno 840
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB
|
16 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
14.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6,450
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
21.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
PLS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1612 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
537 nits
|
N/A
|
4500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
510 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.27 %
|
81.85 %
|
89.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.50 %
|
N/A
|
94.49 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.49 mm
|
164.2 mm
|
162.98 mm
|
Width
|
74.53 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
76.81 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.99 mm
|
9.1 mm
|
8.19 mm
|
Weight
|
178.8 grams
|
188 grams
|
232 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Front Camera
Battery
Battery Test Results
Storage
Network & Connectivity
Multimedia
Sensors
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹11,499
|
₹159,999
|