|
78%
Moto G32 128GB
₹18,999
|
78%
POCO M4 Pro
₹15,490
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G32 128GB vs POCO M4 Pro
Comparing the Moto G32 128GB vs POCO M4 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO M4 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,828, while Moto G32 128GB scores 1,582, making POCO M4 Pro the better performer.
Display: Moto G32 128GB offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while POCO M4 Pro offers 6.43 inches, making Moto G32 128GB the larger display of the two. POCO M4 Pro features a AMOLED display compared to Moto G32 128GB's IPS LCD, making POCO M4 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO M4 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Moto G32 128GB offers 50 MP, making POCO M4 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Moto G32 128GB and POCO M4 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both Moto G32 128GB and POCO M4 Pro offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: POCO M4 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Moto G32 128GB offers 128 GB, making POCO M4 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: POCO M4 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G32 128GB has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Moto G32 128GB
₹18,999
@ Flipkart
|
✕
POCO M4 Pro
₹15,490
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
22 Mar, 2023
|
28 Feb, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Turbo Power Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(121,364 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(188,175 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
245,680
AnTuTu Score
|
309,983
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 40m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
₹15,490
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 22, 2023
(Official)
|
Feb 28, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
OS Updates
|
1 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
2 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
245,680
|
309,983
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
44.0 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.48 %
|
84.64 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.8 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
161.7 mm
|
159.8 mm
|
Width
|
73.8 mm
|
73.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
8 mm
|
Weight
|
184 grams
|
179.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Macro Video |
Short Video Mode
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 40m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 8m 58s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.84 W/kg Body: 1.07 W/kg
|
Head: 0.855 W/kg Body: 0.853 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
₹15,490
|