|
78%
Moto G32 128GB
₹18,999
|
73%
Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G32 128GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB
Comparing the Moto G32 128GB vs Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G32 128GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,582, while Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB scores 1,257, making Moto G32 128GB the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB offers a screen size of 6.71 inches, while Moto G32 128GB offers 6.5 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB the larger display of the two. Both Moto G32 128GB and Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Moto G32 128GB and Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G32 128GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB offers 5 MP, making Moto G32 128GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G32 128GB delivers longer battery life with 19h 40m, while Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB delivers 12h 12m, making Moto G32 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G32 128GB and Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: Moto G32 128GB receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB has a rating of 4.
|
Moto G32 128GB
₹18,999
@ Flipkart
|
Xiaomi Redmi 12C 128GB
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
22 Mar, 2023
|
06 Apr, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.71 inches (17.04 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Turbo Power Charging
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(121,364 ratings)
|
4/5
(14,017 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
245,680
AnTuTu Score
|
251,866
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 40m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
Not Available in any store
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 22, 2023
(Official)
|
Apr 06, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
OS Updates
|
1 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
2 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
HyperOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
245,680
|
251,866
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
44.0 %
|
18.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.71 inches (17.04 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20.6:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
268 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.48 %
|
83.08 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.8 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
161.7 mm
|
168.7 mm
|
Width
|
73.8 mm
|
76.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
184 grams
|
192 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
0.08 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Macro Video |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
5 MP
Primary Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Turbo Power Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 40m
|
12h 12m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 8m 58s
|
4h 19m 36s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.84 W/kg Body: 1.07 W/kg
|
Head: 0.868 W/kg Body: 0.769 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
Not Available in any store
|