|
78%
Moto G32 128GB
₹18,999
|
76%
realme C53 6GB RAM
₹11,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G32 128GB vs realme C53 6GB RAM
Comparing the Moto G32 128GB vs realme C53 6GB RAM across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G32 128GB runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while realme C53 6GB RAM runs at 1.8 GHz, making Moto G32 128GB the better performer.
Display: realme C53 6GB RAM offers a screen size of 6.74 inches, while Moto G32 128GB offers 6.5 inches, making realme C53 6GB RAM the larger display of the two. Both Moto G32 128GB and realme C53 6GB RAM feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme C53 6GB RAM offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while Moto G32 128GB offers 50 MP, making realme C53 6GB RAM better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G32 128GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while realme C53 6GB RAM offers 8 MP, making Moto G32 128GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Moto G32 128GB and realme C53 6GB RAM offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Moto G32 128GB and realme C53 6GB RAM offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: realme C53 6GB RAM receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Moto G32 128GB has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Moto G32 128GB
₹18,999
@ Flipkart
|
✕
realme C53 6GB RAM
₹11,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
22 Mar, 2023
|
20 Sep, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
Unisoc T612
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
108 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Turbo Power Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(121,364 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(127,449 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
245,680
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
19h 40m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
₹11,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 22, 2023
(Official)
|
Sep 20, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v13
|
OS Updates
|
1 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
2 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Unisoc T612
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
245,680
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
44.0 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
560 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.48 %
|
85.52 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89.8 %
|
90.3 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.7 mm
|
167.2 mm
|
Width
|
73.8 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
184 grams
|
186 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
108 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 83° field-of-view23.6 mm focal length 1/1.67" sensor size S5KHM6 ISO-CELL 0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Macro Video |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 40m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 8m 58s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.84 W/kg Body: 1.07 W/kg
|
Head: 1.183 W/kg Body: 0.775 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹18,999
|
₹11,999
|