Moto G57 Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 15

Comparing the Moto G57 Power vs Xiaomi Redmi 15 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Moto G57 Power scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,931, while Xiaomi Redmi 15 scores 2,262, making Moto G57 Power the better performer.

Display: Xiaomi Redmi 15 offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while Moto G57 Power offers 6.72 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 15 the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi 15 features a IPS LCD display compared to Moto G57 Power's LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi 15 the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Moto G57 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 15 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: Both Moto G57 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 15 feature a 8 MP primary front camera.

Battery: Moto G57 Power delivers longer battery life with 15h 18m, while Xiaomi Redmi 15 delivers 14h 54m, making Moto G57 Power the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Both Moto G57 Power and Xiaomi Redmi 15 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.

Expert Review: Moto G57 Power receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while Xiaomi Redmi 15 is rated 7.

User Rating: Moto G57 Power receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Xiaomi Redmi 15 has a rating of 4.2.

Moto G57 Power

₹20,249

@ Amazon

Xiaomi Redmi 15

₹20,499

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

79%

78%

Release Date

03 Dec, 2025

28 Aug, 2025

Performance


Snapdragon 6s Gen 4	Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
8 GB RAM	6 GB RAM

Display


6.72 inches (17.07 cm)	6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
LCD	IPS LCD
1080x2400 px (FHD+)	1080x2340 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	144 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera	50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera
8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	N/A

Front Camera


8 MP	8 MP Wide Angle Lens

Battery


7000 mAh	7000 mAh
30W Turbo Charging	33W Fast Charging
No Wireless Charging	No Wireless Charging

Storage

128 GB	128 GB
UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2

Expert Review

8.2/10

Read Expert Review

7.0/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Exceptional battery life
Discrete leather design
Dependable performance
Natural camera outputs

Two-day battery life
Premium design
Big screen for bingeing content

Cons

Minimal OS upgrades
Heavy build
Noticeably thick bezels

Thick bezels
Phone seems unnecessarily large
Low-light photography could be better

User Ratings

4.3/5

(880 ratings)

4.2/5

(5,351 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

817,331 AnTuTu Score	463,289 AnTuTu Score
15h 18m Battery Life (PC Mark)	14h 54m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹20,249

@ Amazon

₹20,499

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Video

There are no videos available for the device.

1 Video

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Nov 24, 2025

(Official)

Aug 19, 2025

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

Android v15

OS Updates

1 Year

2 Year

Security Updates

3 Year

4 Year

Custom UI

MY UX

HyperOS

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3

Processor

Octa core

2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55

Octa core

2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 1.95 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

6 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 710

Adreno 619

RAM

8 GB	6 GB / 8 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

817,331

463,289

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

21.0 s

34.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

783

N/A

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

5.0 %

6.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

21.5 %

23.7 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Display Type

LCD

IPS LCD

Screen Size

6.72 inches (17.07 cm)

6.9 inches (17.53 cm)

Resolution

1080x2400 px (FHD+)

1080x2340 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

1050 nits

850 nits

HBM Brightness

1050 nits

N/A

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

144 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

19.5:9

Pixel Density

391 ppi

374 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

85.74 %

86.04 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass Glass 7i

N/A

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

90.53 %

N/A

Design

Height

166.23 mm

168.48 mm

Width

76.50 mm

80.45 mm

Thickness

8.60 mm

8.40 mm

Weight

210.6 grams

217 grams

Build Material

Back: Vegan Leather

Back: Plastic

Water Resistance

Yes Splash proof IP64

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Good

Resolution

50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size LYT 600 0.8µm pixel size

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

N/A

Autofocus

Yes Phase Detection Autofocus

Yes

OIS

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

6150 x 8150 Pixels

8150 x 6150 Pixels

Settings

N/A	Exposure compensation ISO control

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

Camera Features

8 x Digital Zoom
Face detection
Filters

Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Filters
Touch to focus

Video Recording

Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @120 fps

Full HD @30 fps

Video Recording Features

Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion
Audio Zoom

N/A

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera

Autofocus

Flash

N/A

Camera Features

Fixed Focus

N/A

Video Recording

Full HD @30 fps

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Capacity

7000 mAh

Battery Type

Si/C Li-Ion

Silicon Carbon

Quick Charging

Yes 30W Turbo Charging

Yes 33W Fast Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

15h 18m

14h 54m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

1h 13m 0s

1h 18m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

128 GB

128 GB / 256 GB

Storage Type

UFS 2.2

Expandable Storage

No	Yes Up to 2 TB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N26 / N28 / N71 / N75
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1500(band 32) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5)

SIM 2

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5)