Moto G67 Power vs realme 16

Comparing the Moto G67 Power vs realme 16 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Moto G67 Power scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,991, while realme 16 scores 2,068, making Moto G67 Power the better performer.

Display: Moto G67 Power offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while realme 16 offers 6.57 inches, making Moto G67 Power the larger display of the two. realme 16 features a Flexible AMOLED display compared to Moto G67 Power's LCD, making realme 16 the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Moto G67 Power and realme 16 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: realme 16 offers a higher front camera resolution with 50 MP, while Moto G67 Power offers 32 MP, making realme 16 better for front camera photography.

Battery: Both Moto G67 Power and realme 16 offer the same 7000 mAh battery capacity.

Storage: Both Moto G67 Power and realme 16 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.

Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Moto G67 Power and realme 16 equally at 8.1.

User Rating: realme 16 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Moto G67 Power has a rating of 4.3.

Moto G67 Power

₹21,090

@ Amazon

realme 16

₹33,999

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

83%

80%

Release Date

12 Nov, 2025

06 Apr, 2026

Performance


Snapdragon 7s Gen 2	MediaTek Dimensity 6400 Turbo
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
8 GB RAM	8 GB RAM

Display


6.7 inches (17.02 cm)	6.57 inches (16.69 cm)
LCD	Flexible AMOLED
1080x2400 px (FHD+)	1080x2372 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera	50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera
8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	2 MP Mono Camera

Front Camera


32 MP Wide Angle Lens	50 MP

Battery


7000 mAh	7000 mAh
30W Turbo Power Charging	60W Fast Charging
No Wireless Charging	N/A

Storage

128 GB	128 GB
UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2

Expert Review

8.1/10

Read Expert Review

8.1/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Outstanding battery endurance
Distinct leather design
Reliable performance
Realistic camera outputs

Bright, vibrant AMOLED display
Slim, lightweight build
Great battery life
Good selfie camera

Cons

Limited Android updates
Relatively thicker bezels
Slightly heavy

Underwhelming performance
No ultrawide lens, no OIS

User Ratings

4.3/5

(23,471 ratings)

4.5/5

(895 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

851,360 AnTuTu Score	611,679 AnTuTu Score
N/A	14h 38m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹21,090

@ Amazon

₹33,999

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Video

1 More Video

There are no videos available for the device.

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Nov 05, 2025

(Official)

Apr 02, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v15

Android v16

OS Updates

1 Year

3 Year

Security Updates

3 Year

4 Year

Custom UI

N/A

Realme UI

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Good

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2

MediaTek Dimensity 6400 Turbo

Processor

Octa core

2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 1.95 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55

Octa core

2.5 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

6 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 710

Mali-G57 MC2

RAM

8 GB / 12 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

851,360

611,679

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

20.0 s

30.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A

382

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

5.0 %

7.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

15.5 %

21.0 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Display Type

LCD	Flexible AMOLED

Screen Size

6.7 inches (17.02 cm)

6.57 inches (16.69 cm)

Resolution

1080x2400 px (FHD+)

1080x2372 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

1050 nits

4200 nits

HBM Brightness

N/A

1400 nits

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

393 ppi

397 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

85.23 %

88.24 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass Glass 7i

Yes

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

Yes HDR 10+

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

85.97 %

93 %

Design

Height

166.23 mm

158.30 mm

Width

76.5 mm

75.1 mm

Thickness

8.6 mm

8.10 mm

Weight

210 grams

183 grams

Build Material

Back: Vegan Leather

Back: Plastic

Water Resistance

Yes Splash proof IP64

N/A

Ruggedness

Dust proof

N/A

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size LYT 600 0.8µm pixel size

50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera

Autofocus

Yes Phase Detection Autofocus

Yes

OIS

Yes

Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Yes

Image Resolution

8150 x 6150 Pixels

N/A

Settings

Exposure compensation ISO control

N/A

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

Cinema Mode

Camera Features

8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus

10 x Digital Zoom

Video Recording

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps

Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @30/60/120 fps

Video Recording Features

Dual Video Recording
Audio Zoom

Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

32 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera0.7µm pixel size

50 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera

Autofocus

N/A

Flash

No	Yes Screen flash

Video Recording

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps

Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @30 fps

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Capacity

7000 mAh

Battery Type

Silicon Carbon

N/A

Quick Charging

Yes 30W Turbo Power Charging

Yes 60W Fast Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

N/A

14h 38m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

1h 18m 0s

1h 11m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

128 GB / 256 GB

Storage Type

UFS 2.2

Expandable Storage

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 1700(band 66) / 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5)

SIM 2

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N2 / N3 / N5 / N7 / N8 / N20 / N26 / N28 / N66
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 12) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) / 1700(band 66)