|
74%
Moto G9
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
Lava Virat V1 5G
₹13,099
@Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto G9 vs Lava Virat V1 5G
Comparing the Moto G9 vs Lava Virat V1 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Virat V1 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,699, while Moto G9 scores 1,416, making Lava Virat V1 5G the better performer.
Display: Lava Virat V1 5G offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while Moto G9 offers 6.5 inches, making Lava Virat V1 5G the larger display of the two. Moto G9 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Virat V1 5G's LCD, making Moto G9 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 13 MP, making Moto G9 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G9 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Virat V1 5G offers 5 MP, making Moto G9 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G9 delivers longer battery life with 21h 44m, while Lava Virat V1 5G delivers 21h 27m, making Moto G9 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Moto G9 and Lava Virat V1 5G offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Moto G9 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Lava Virat V1 5G has a rating of 4.1.
|
Moto G9
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Virat V1 5G
₹13,099
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
31 Aug, 2020
|
28 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 662
|
Unisoc T8200
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
10W
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(47,025 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(1,097 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
176,500
AnTuTu Score
|
515,146
AnTuTu Score
|
|
21h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
21h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,099
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 31, 2020
(Official)
|
Jul 24, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
1 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Year
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Unisoc T8200
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A76 2.3 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A76 2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57 MP4
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
176,500
|
515,146
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
39.0 s
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
312
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.3 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.57 %
|
86.36 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
87 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
165.2 mm
|
165.85 mm
|
Width
|
75.7 mm
|
76.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.1 mm
|
8.75 mm
|
Weight
|
200 grams
|
210 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.71.6µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Filters
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @60 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps 720x480 @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Slow Motion
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 47 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Yes 10W Charging Time: 185 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
21h 44m
|
21h 27m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 5m
|
3h 7m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.47 W/kg Body: 1.37 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,099
@ Amazon
|