|
75%
Motorola One Action
₹11,199
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Motorola One Action vs Samsung Galaxy A50
Comparing the Motorola One Action vs Samsung Galaxy A50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Action scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,398, while Samsung Galaxy A50 scores 5,372, making Motorola One Action the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Motorola One Action offers 6.3 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Motorola One Action's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 25 MP, while Motorola One Action offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while Motorola One Action offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while Motorola One Action offers 3500 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola One Action offers 128 GB, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Motorola One Action and Samsung Galaxy A50 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A50 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Motorola One Action has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Motorola One Action
₹11,199
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
30 Aug, 2019
|
02 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
25 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
16 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
|
25 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
15W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(30,589 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(100,914 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
143,309
AnTuTu Score
|
143,399
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 31m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 30, 2019
(Official)
|
Mar 02, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
143,309
|
143,399
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
16.0 s
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
21:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
435 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.52 %
|
84.97 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
160.1 mm
|
158.5 mm
|
Width
|
71.2 mm
|
74.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.15 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
176 grams
|
166 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
25 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.726 mm focal length CMOS image sensor |
|
16 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera13 mm focal length |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
5288 x 3968 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 23 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 31m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 6m 2s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|