Motorola V295 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670

Share  

Comparing the Motorola V295 vs Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Motorola V295 offers 0.3 MP, making Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 better for rear camera photography.

...read more
Motorola V295
(Discontinued)
Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670
₹12,860
(Discontinued)
Add to Compare

Summary

Release Date

01 Jul, 2003
25 Mar, 2011

Performance

N/A
(upto 600 MHz)
N/A
280 MB RAM

Display

N/A
3.3 inches (8.38 cm)
N/A
LCD
128.00x128 pixels px
320x240 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera
5 MP
Primary Camera

Battery

N/A
1350 mAh

Storage

N/A
160 MB

User Ratings

N/A
3.8/5
(386 ratings)

User Feedback

General

Operating System

N/A
Android v2.2

Performance

Processor

N/A
600 MHz

Graphics (GPU)

N/A
Adreno 200

RAM

N/A
280 MB

Display

Display Type

N/A
LCD

Screen Size

N/A
3.3 inches  (8.38 cm)

Resolution

128.00x128 pixels px
320x240 px

Pixel Density

N/A
121 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A
50.04 %

Design

Height

87.00 mm
110.2 mm

Width

47.00 mm
61.2 mm

Thickness

22.00 mm
12.60 mm

Weight

97 grams
108 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell
N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera
5 MP
Primary Camera

Autofocus

N/A
Yes

Flash

N/A
Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

N/A
320x240 @ 15
176x144

Battery

Capacity

N/A
1350 mAh

Battery Type

N/A
Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 5(2G)
Up to 6.16(3G) / Up to 10.33(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A
160 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes
Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM
Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported
5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)

Bluetooth

No
Yes v2.1

GPS

N/A
Yes with A-GPS

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No
N/A

Sensors

Other Sensors

N/A
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass

Java

Yes
N/A

Browser

Yes
N/A